Speak Better Grammar

July 22, 2009

Vanity Fair Edits Sarah Palin!

Filed under: Grammar, Politics, Punctuation, Writing — Vander Kitten @ 10:12 am

Vanity Fair, how I love you.  I recently lamented the terrible writing in Sarah Palin’s resignation, but didn’t have the time, fortitude, or red ink to edit it.  Vanity Fair had all three.  Read their edit here.

Enjoy!  If you are a grammar geek like me, you can consider it a mini-holiday.

___

Update:  Thank you, Jeff, for this link.  I actually find diagramming sentences to be therapeutic, but you might not all agree.   But it is enlightening.  My favorite part of it is this sentence, when the author is trying to diagram a particularly twisted sentence:

“I had to give up. This sentence is not for diagramming lightweights. If there’s anyone out there who can kick this sucker into line, I’d be delighted to hear from you. To me, it’s not English—it’s a collection of words strung together to elicit a reaction, floating ands and prepositional phrases (“with that vote of the American people”) be damned. It requires not a diagram but a selection of push buttons.”

July 11, 2009

Merriam-Webster Announces New Words!

Filed under: Grammar, Words — Vander Kitten @ 10:27 am

It’s my favorite time of year again. Haven’t you been waiting for it?  Yes, there’s nice weather all around and time for staycations.  But I’m talking about Merriam-Webster’s new words!

What’s that? You’ve never heard of a “staycation”? Well, now you can find it in the dictionary.

For the second year in a row, I’m happy with a few of the entries.  I like “fan fiction” and “waterboarding.”  (Well, that the word exists in the dictionary, not that the practice exists.)  Plus, I always wondered if that particular torture should be hyphenated, and now I know it shouldn’t be. 

But did we need “frenemy” and “green-collar”?  “Memory foam” is useful in some circles, I suppose, as is “zip line.”  And “sock puppet” isn’t new (it was new in 1959) but has a new secondary definition you might not have known. 

Go enjoy these new words, folks.  If you can use each one in a sentence (correctly) by the end of the weekend, I’ll send you a present.

July 6, 2009

Sarah Palin’s Resignation Tragedy

Filed under: Grammar, Politics, Punctuation, Rants, Writing — Vander Kitten @ 9:21 pm

Judging by the comments from my last post, only a third of my readers will stop reading an article if the writer employs bad grammar or punctuation.  The other two-thirds might judge the writer or criticize him or her, but will continue to read. 

Following that, I just have to wonder what you all think of this piece of writing.   The link is to Sarah Palin’s speech announcing that she’s resigning as Governor of Alaska.  I’ve been meaning to write about it for days, but the flu has kept me from it.  I must thank my dear friend Brendan for pointing out what a tragedy of the English language it is.  (If you enjoyed the SNL Tina Fey skits from the election, please go read the speech in its entirety.  I don’t think any comedy was intended, but it sure is easy to find in it.)

 Sarah Palin gave this speech as governor.  She has a college degree, a staff who could have written for this her, and what I can only assume is access to several proofreaders.  Yet we end up with many sections like this:

“Alaska’s mission – to contribute to America. We’re strategic in the world as the air crossroads of the world, as a gatekeeper of the continent. Bold visionaries knew this – Alaska would be part of America’s great destiny.
Our destiny to be reached by responsibly developing our natural resources. This land, blessed with clean air, water, wildlife, minerals, and oil and gas. It’s energy! God gave us energy.”

Yes, God gave us energy.  And man gave us grammatical rules and tools.  But Gov. Palin gave us sentence fragments, run-on sentences, and superfluous punctuation marks.  Right here, in the following two sentences, she shows a blazing disregard for verbs:  ”Our destiny to be reached by responsibly developing our natural resources. This land, blessed with clean air, water, wildlife, minerals, and oil and gas.”

I won’t go into how ridiculous I think her argument is that staying in office her full term would be just “politics as usual.”  I promise.  It’s killing me, of course, but I don’t want to distract from the blatantly bad writing that is her resignation speech.  It’s just bad writing, people.  I started to get out my red pen and my Google Docs to share some fun with you, but I didn’t have the strength.  Where would I even start?  Would it just be editing to correct for punctuation errors?  That would take a while.  Then there would be the lack of subjects and predicates in any logical relation to each other.  Or would I try to get into style? I couldn’t get into style, of course.  I am too far away from her politics and mindset to try to give her style tips.

I realize, of course, that this is the transcript of a speech, and some politicians take artistic license with speeches.  But what artistic value is served in the next sentence? “So much success in this first term – and with this success I am proud to take credit… for hiring the right people!”  Why the dash?  Why the ellipses?   And even if it is a speech transcript, it’s posted on the State of Alaska’s website.  Doesn’t that deserve proofreading?

I don’t have a lot of points I’m trying to make here.  I’m just trying to say that our elected officials should pay attention to the elementary grammar rules we were all taught in grade school.  Is that asking so much?

Blog at WordPress.com.